• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
TSB Alfresco Cobrand White tagline

Technology Services Group

  • Home
  • Products
    • Alfresco Enterprise Viewer
    • OpenContent Search
    • OpenContent Case
    • OpenContent Forms
    • OpenMigrate
    • OpenContent Web Services
    • OpenCapture
    • OpenOverlay
  • Solutions
    • Alfresco Content Accelerator for Claims Management
      • Claims Demo Series
    • Alfresco Content Accelerator for Policy & Procedure Management
      • Compliance Demo Series
    • OpenContent Accounts Payable
    • OpenContent Contract Management
    • OpenContent Batch Records
    • OpenContent Government
    • OpenContent Corporate Forms
    • OpenContent Construction Management
    • OpenContent Digital Archive
    • OpenContent Human Resources
    • OpenContent Patient Records
  • Platforms
    • Alfresco Consulting
      • Alfresco Case Study – Canadian Museum of Human Rights
      • Alfresco Case Study – New York Philharmonic
      • Alfresco Case Study – New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association
      • Alfresco Case Study – American Society for Clinical Pathology
      • Alfresco Case Study – American Association of Insurance Services
      • Alfresco Case Study – United Cerebral Palsy
    • HBase
    • DynamoDB
    • OpenText & Documentum Consulting
      • Upgrades – A Well Documented Approach
      • Life Science Solutions
        • Life Sciences Project Sampling
    • Veeva Consulting
    • Ephesoft
    • Workshare
  • Case Studies
    • White Papers
    • 11 Billion Document Migration
    • Learning Zone
    • Digital Asset Collection – Canadian Museum of Human Rights
    • Digital Archive and Retrieval – ASCP
    • Digital Archives – New York Philharmonic
    • Insurance Claim Processing – New York Property Insurance
    • Policy Forms Management with Machine Learning – AAIS
    • Liferay and Alfresco Portal – United Cerebral Palsy of Greater Chicago
  • About
    • Contact Us
  • Blog

Top 5 Differences between Records Management and Document Management

You are here: Home / Alfresco / Top 5 Differences between Records Management and Document Management

September 22, 2016

Several of our clients have been wrestling with the topic of Information Governance (IG) and the difference between Records Management (RM) and Document Management (DM). We participated in several discussions while at NIRMA where the need to incorporate Electronic Document Management functionality is falling under the Records Management department. Long term, records managers are looking at Records Management solutions to solve Document Management needs. While on the surface it may seem that these two areas have many synergies, the features/functionality required to support Document Management are quite different then records management.

A Document Management (DM) system provides functionality for living documents. Living documents can be versioned. Documents move through different states (Draft, Routing for Approval, Approved, etc.).  DM systems provide the ability to electronic review and approve documents, as well as release them for use. Documents can also be retired or obsoleted in these systems. When a document is obsoleted, it is no longer living. At this point a Document can be thought of as a Record or static entity.

A Records Management (RM) system manages records/items that are not living.  Records are not versioned. They are stored, attributed, and retention policies are applied specifying when they can be permanently destroyed.

Both applications need the ability for end users to search (property and full text), securely retrieve content, view content and properties, view related content, etc. While there are significant differences, you can see that there is plenty of overlap. It is not surprising that Records Managers are being asked to take on the task of implementing an Electronic Document Management System (EDMS) within their organizations.  Below is a list of 5 items that should be considered when expanding your Records Management application into an Electronic Document Management System (EDMS).

  1. Usage– A Document Management system is frequently accessed by a broad range of users across the organization. Content stored in a DM system is actively used to perform daily job functions.  Whereas an RM system, while equally important, is typically not as actively accessed since it holds records no longer in use by the business. It is not uncommon for users to hang onto records; afraid that turning them over will result in a loss of access. This mindset, by nature, limits users’ interaction with a RM system. Due to the more frequent access by a larger user base, a user interface that is intuitive is a very important feature of a Document Management application.
  2. Large View Only Population – Document Management applications can quickly get complex allowing for authors to create documents, relationships between documents, initiate workflows, etc. However, like an RM application, many of the users just require read-only access to the content stored by the application. To reduce training requirements, system load, as well as user licensing, our DM clients have found lots of success in implementing a read-only application that provides quick and easy access to content. Learn more about the benefits for this approach by reading our blog post.
  3. Simple Search – Managing records in a DM system, definitely creates overhead for users importing and creating content. However, the power of DM is realized when users across the organization can easily find and report on content. This is a key component to a Document Management system. For more information see some of our blog posts comparing different search interfaces.
  4. Electronic Workflow – Living documents are versioned and require re-approval, sometimes very frequently. Electronic review and approval is a key feature of a DM application. Keeping this functionality simple for users, yet flexible to handle changing business functionality is a key requirement. For more information on typical workflow requirements click here.
  5. RM and DM do need to Talk – Historically, records management software focused on imaging and technologies to capture information at the end of its useful life, when it is no longer actively needed by the organization. Today that perspective is shortsighted. Legal discovery, big data, and regulations require information be managed cradle to grave. For an organization to be legally protected, any DM system must interact with an RM application and break the historical notion that RM is an end-of-the-line function.

We’d love to hear your thoughts on RM and DM below in the comments.

Filed Under: Alfresco, Contract Management, Documentum, ECM Landscape, ECM Solutions, Hadoop, Open Text, Product Suite, Records Management

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Search

Related Posts

  • FileNet – Adding a Modern Interface to a Legacy ECM
  • Suggested Redactions for Documentum, Alfresco or Hadoop using OpenRedact
  • ECM Roadmap – Thoughts on Planning for the Future
  • 2017 ECM Thoughts and Predictions as well as recap of 2016 postings
  • Documentum – Do More with OpenContent and OpenAnnotate
  • ECM 2.0 – One-Step vs. Two-Step Migrations
  • ECM 2.0 – Can you build it yourself?
  • ECM Large Repositories – Volume Testing With the TSG Test Harness
  • ECM Sales Myths for 2019
  • ECM 2.0 – What does it mean?

Recent Posts

  • Alfresco Content Accelerator and Alfresco Enterprise Viewer – Improving User Collaboration Efficiency
  • Alfresco Content Accelerator – Document Notification Distribution Lists
  • Alfresco Webinar – Productivity Anywhere: How modern claim and policy document processing can help the new work-from-home normal succeed
  • Alfresco – Viewing Annotations on Versions
  • Alfresco Content Accelerator – Collaboration Enhancements
stacks-of-paper

11 BILLION DOCUMENT
BENCHMARK
OVERVIEW

Learn how TSG was able to leverage DynamoDB, S3, ElasticSearch & AWS to successfully migrate 11 Billion documents.

Download White Paper

Footer

Search

Contact

22 West Washington St
5th Floor
Chicago, IL 60602

inquiry@tsgrp.com

312.372.7777

Copyright © 2023 · Technology Services Group, Inc. · Log in

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Please accept this site's cookies, but you can opt-out if you wish. Privacy Policy ACCEPT | Cookie settings
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT