• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
TSB Alfresco Cobrand White tagline

Technology Services Group

  • Home
  • Products
    • Alfresco Enterprise Viewer
    • OpenContent Search
    • OpenContent Case
    • OpenContent Forms
    • OpenMigrate
    • OpenContent Web Services
    • OpenCapture
    • OpenOverlay
  • Solutions
    • Alfresco Content Accelerator for Claims Management
      • Claims Demo Series
    • Alfresco Content Accelerator for Policy & Procedure Management
      • Compliance Demo Series
    • OpenContent Accounts Payable
    • OpenContent Contract Management
    • OpenContent Batch Records
    • OpenContent Government
    • OpenContent Corporate Forms
    • OpenContent Construction Management
    • OpenContent Digital Archive
    • OpenContent Human Resources
    • OpenContent Patient Records
  • Platforms
    • Alfresco Consulting
      • Alfresco Case Study – Canadian Museum of Human Rights
      • Alfresco Case Study – New York Philharmonic
      • Alfresco Case Study – New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association
      • Alfresco Case Study – American Society for Clinical Pathology
      • Alfresco Case Study – American Association of Insurance Services
      • Alfresco Case Study – United Cerebral Palsy
    • HBase
    • DynamoDB
    • OpenText & Documentum Consulting
      • Upgrades – A Well Documented Approach
      • Life Science Solutions
        • Life Sciences Project Sampling
    • Veeva Consulting
    • Ephesoft
    • Workshare
  • Case Studies
    • White Papers
    • 11 Billion Document Migration
    • Learning Zone
    • Digital Asset Collection – Canadian Museum of Human Rights
    • Digital Archive and Retrieval – ASCP
    • Digital Archives – New York Philharmonic
    • Insurance Claim Processing – New York Property Insurance
    • Policy Forms Management with Machine Learning – AAIS
    • Liferay and Alfresco Portal – United Cerebral Palsy of Greater Chicago
  • About
    • Contact Us
  • Blog

Documentum – Webtop and OpenContent Contributor Comparison

You are here: Home / Documentum / Documentum – Webtop and OpenContent Contributor Comparison

March 6, 2018

In the last post of our 2018 making Documentum better series, we compared searching and viewing documents between Webtop and OpenContent Management Suite.  For this post, we’re going to compare the the contributor functionality available in Webtop and compare that to OpenContent Management Suite.  Our evaluation is based on what is configurable using the out-of-the-box products without any coding or customization.  This post focuses on some of the highlights of document creation, checkout, and checkin.  Our next post in the series will focus on working with folders and documents beyond import, and check in/out.

Content Transfer Methods

One of the major differences between Webtop and OpenContent Management Suite for contributors is the method for transferring content to and from the repository for checkin, checkout, and import operations.

To understand the details of each product requires an understanding browser extensions and plugins.  Plugins, in general, help to enhance the user experience by providing functionality that’s impossible to achieve by just using HTML and JavaScript.  Plugins were commonly used for animations, streaming video, and multi-file upload for early versions of internet browsers.  Modern applications typically utilize HTML5.  Older applications that utilize plugins generally utilize the ActiveX framework, Java applets, Adobe Flash, and/or browser extensions.

Plugins can pose problems due to the requirement that software to be installed and maintained on the client PC.  These downloads can be difficult to roll out and update on an enterprise level due to security restrictions.  After all, plugins inherently provide web applications access to the file system on the client PC, which is often a large security concern.

Plugins can also be problematic when considering the compatibility between versions, operating systems, and browsers.  Often times, a plugin might break due to an upgrade.  In corporations where all PCs have the same image and installs and updates are centrally managed, it’s less of an issue because all PCs have the same software installed.  However, more often than not, a common PC image for an entire company is never a reality because some users are granted admin rights to their PCs.  Many companies also make their ECM web interfaces available over an extranet, opening up the user base to a variety of browsers, operating systems, Java, and Flash versions.

Webtop utilizes Unified Content Facilities (UCF) to perform content transfer.  Pre Webtop 6.8.2, UCF is a Java applet developed by EMC and is used by every content transfer operation in Webtop.  These operations include checkin, checkout, cancel checkout, edit, import, and export.  UCF allows Webtop to behave more like a desktop application.   In version 6.8.2, the Java applet is no longer used, but each client machine still requires a browser extension and a native exe/cab installation that requires a client Java Virtual Machine (JVM) version 1.7+.  While this removes the security problem of installing an Applet on the client machine, but Java is still utilized and the issue of maintaining client installs for content transfer is still present.  Additionally, the native client installation requires administrator privileges to install, which will pose a problem for many Webtop customers.  For more information, see the “Installing browser extension and native client application” section in the Webtop 6.8.2 Deployment Guide.

Webtop contributor notes:

  • Users do not have to specify a folder location or browse to files when editing and checking out content
  • When viewing documents, content is downloaded and launched in the native application without having to save a local copy first
  • Webtop relies entirely on UCF to allow users to view files.  No web preview of documents is provided, even for documents that are PDF or have PDF renditions.
  • While the Java Applet is no longer in 6.8.2, clients still require a JRE, a browser extension, as well as a native client install.
  • Most users have grown accustomed to working with web based applications.  Some of the desktop-like functionality provided by UCF may go unused or even confuse users (“I just checked out a document, but where did it go on my hard drive?”)

OpenContent Management Suite is built entirely using modern HTML5 web technologies (HTML, JavaScript, and CSS).  No plugins, browser extensions, or Flash components are used at all.  A pure HTML5 checkout and checkin does require a file download through the browser, and then upload via either a drag and drop or the traditional “browse” button.  Unlike Webtop, OpenContent does have integration with both Office Online as well as Google Drive to allow document editing directly in the browser.  Using these integrations, downloads and uploads are avoided all together since the user simply edits the document in the browser.   For importing content, OpenContent can support the typical drag and drop and file browse options, but additionally supports adding documents via Box, GMail, as well as scanning documents with OpenCapture.

OpenContent Management Suite also provides smart tools for importing documents into a folder.  Some examples:

  • Metadata Inheritance – in case management scenarios, documents often share metadata with the case folder.  For example, an underwriting document typically contains a policy_number attribute that’s also populated on the policy case folder.  With OpenContent, these attributes can be pre-populated and optionally locked down when importing a document.  So in this case, the user would not not need to re-key the policy_number attribute, or any other common metadata fields.
  • Common Properties and Bulk Import – while importing multiple documents at once, OpenContent allows the user to set some properties once that apply across all documents.  This alleviates the need for the user to set the same property value across each document one by one.
  • Heads Up Indexing – when adding a document to the repository, OpenContent can display a preview of the document in the browser to aid in setting document properties.  The user can also select text in the document to populate attributes.  This is often used, for example, in cases like importing an Invoice and setting an invoice_number attribute.  Rather than typing the value in, the user can simply highlight the value on the invoice, which will populate the metadata field automatically.
  • Smart Processing of Emails – when OpenContent detects that the user is uploading an MSG file, it smartly pulls off any attachments and adds them to the list of documents queued for upload.  After the import, the email and attachments are related using a parent/child relationship so the user can easily see attachments when looking at the email.
  • Scanning with OpenCapture – OpenContent Management Suite integrates seamlessly with OpenCapture to allow users to scan documents directly into the repository from a desktop scanner.

Additional OpenContent contributor notes:

  • OpenContent does not require any plugins or browser extensions for content transfer
  • For document editing, a complete in-browser experience is available for clients that utilize Office Online or Google Apps
  • OpenContent provides a user experience that is aligned with most other web applications
  • Multiple files can be imported in a single operation
  • Documents can be imported form the file system via drag and drop, scanned via OpenCapture, or pulled from Box or GMail

Summary

Many Documentum clients that are still on Webtop face the question – is it better to upgrade the old WDK-based Webtop application (often heavily customized) to Webtop 6.8.2 or move to something else?  The removal of the Applet in 6.8.2 is nice, but the new requirements are only marginally better.  We would say that since Documentum is no longer investing in Webtop it does not make sense to upgrade and clients should look to switch to a modern interface.  For many of today’s business application users that are accustomed to working in streamlined web applications, options like the OpenContent Management Suite provide a better long-term direction that staying on Webtop.

Filed Under: Documentum, OpenContent Management Suite, Webtop

Reader Interactions

Trackbacks

  1. Documentum – How to make it better – 2018 Blog Series says:
    March 12, 2018 at 9:27 am

    […] Documentum – Webtop and OpenContent Contributor Comparison […]

    Reply
  2. Documentum – Webtop and OpenContent Folder Comparison says:
    June 13, 2018 at 2:21 pm

    […] as compared to OpenContent Management Suite.  In prior articles, we’ve explored how users add documents to the repository and search for documents.  For this post, we will look into the available functionality for both […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Search

Related Posts

  • Documentum – Webtop and OpenContent Folder Comparison
  • Documentum – Webtop and OpenContent Search Comparison
  • Documentum – Improving the Webtop Experience
  • Documentum Risk – Top 5 Reasons to Ditch Webtop
  • HPI Search Compared to Webtop and D2
  • Documentum – Top Tips for 2016
  • Documentum or Alfresco – Bulk Upload and “Heads up” indexing
  • Documentum or Alfresco – HPI 2.4 adding support for Folder Browsing
  • Enterprise Content Management Predictions – 2015
  • Alfresco or Documentum Collaborative Document Reviews with OpenAnnotate

Recent Posts

  • Alfresco Content Accelerator and Alfresco Enterprise Viewer – Improving User Collaboration Efficiency
  • Alfresco Content Accelerator – Document Notification Distribution Lists
  • Alfresco Webinar – Productivity Anywhere: How modern claim and policy document processing can help the new work-from-home normal succeed
  • Alfresco – Viewing Annotations on Versions
  • Alfresco Content Accelerator – Collaboration Enhancements
stacks-of-paper

11 BILLION DOCUMENT
BENCHMARK
OVERVIEW

Learn how TSG was able to leverage DynamoDB, S3, ElasticSearch & AWS to successfully migrate 11 Billion documents.

Download White Paper

Footer

Search

Contact

22 West Washington St
5th Floor
Chicago, IL 60602

inquiry@tsgrp.com

312.372.7777

Copyright © 2023 · Technology Services Group, Inc. · Log in

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Please accept this site's cookies, but you can opt-out if you wish. Privacy Policy ACCEPT | Cookie settings
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT