• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
TSB Alfresco Cobrand White tagline

Technology Services Group

  • Home
  • Products
    • Alfresco Enterprise Viewer
    • OpenContent Search
    • OpenContent Case
    • OpenContent Forms
    • OpenMigrate
    • OpenContent Web Services
    • OpenCapture
    • OpenOverlay
  • Solutions
    • Alfresco Content Accelerator for Claims Management
      • Claims Demo Series
    • Alfresco Content Accelerator for Policy & Procedure Management
      • Compliance Demo Series
    • OpenContent Accounts Payable
    • OpenContent Contract Management
    • OpenContent Batch Records
    • OpenContent Government
    • OpenContent Corporate Forms
    • OpenContent Construction Management
    • OpenContent Digital Archive
    • OpenContent Human Resources
    • OpenContent Patient Records
  • Platforms
    • Alfresco Consulting
      • Alfresco Case Study – Canadian Museum of Human Rights
      • Alfresco Case Study – New York Philharmonic
      • Alfresco Case Study – New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association
      • Alfresco Case Study – American Society for Clinical Pathology
      • Alfresco Case Study – American Association of Insurance Services
      • Alfresco Case Study – United Cerebral Palsy
    • HBase
    • DynamoDB
    • OpenText & Documentum Consulting
      • Upgrades – A Well Documented Approach
      • Life Science Solutions
        • Life Sciences Project Sampling
    • Veeva Consulting
    • Ephesoft
    • Workshare
  • Case Studies
    • White Papers
    • 11 Billion Document Migration
    • Learning Zone
    • Digital Asset Collection – Canadian Museum of Human Rights
    • Digital Archive and Retrieval – ASCP
    • Digital Archives – New York Philharmonic
    • Insurance Claim Processing – New York Property Insurance
    • Policy Forms Management with Machine Learning – AAIS
    • Liferay and Alfresco Portal – United Cerebral Palsy of Greater Chicago
  • About
    • Contact Us
  • Blog

EFFS Promises and Legacy ECM Vendors – ECM Article Roundup

You are here: Home / Documentum / EFFS Promises and Legacy ECM Vendors – ECM Article Roundup

August 18, 2017

A couple of interesting ECM posts from some of the different analysts that were worth sharing over the last couple of weeks.  This post will present some of those articles as well as our thoughts.

EFFS – Bold Promises of simplicity, Hard Realities of Legacy Migration

Another great article by Alan Pelz-Sharpe of Deep Analysis – Full Article available here.

Alan makes the point: “like Microsoft SharePoint before them, Box, Dropbox, Egnyte, Syncplicity, Accellion and a host of similar vendors…..face the very same challenges their predecessors did:

  • How to get buyers to migrate legacy systems in the first place
  • How to get those that do migrate to go beyond just “lifting and shifting.
  • How to get customers to take ownership of, actively manage and collaboratively use those migrated files.

Alan brings up great points that, if just migrated for cheaper storage, the risk is they will be “lifted and shifted” to cheaper solutions as time goes by.  Great follow-up points included:

  • Migrations can be complicated
  • Is it a worthy investment?
  • The Negative Impact of Cloud Hopping
  • Content Creation Platforms, Smart Migration

TSG Perspective – Alan is dead on in his thoughts that migration is complicated.  We would agree that, for “Viral Collaboration” EFSS type solutions, adding new content is easy, getting companies to move all content and retire “good enough” ECM solutions is significantly harder.  In other discussions with Alan, we did have a disagreement, particularly around Box or other EFSS solutions, in that we do not see their ability to ever get to replace ECM given their collaboration approach.  See our related articles around Box and ECM – What is Box Missing? as well as 9 Market Reasons Box will never be a serious ECM alternative.

An ECM Plan for the Bumpy Days Ahead

Article by Joe Sheply of Doculabs – full article available here.

Joe begins with a very realistic take on the major legacy ECM vendors.

“OpenText’s acquisition of Documentum cast the future of both solutions in doubt: the latter because it seems clear the only motive for purchasing an entirely duplicative software stack is to milk maintenance revenue and the former because OpenText has a poor record of managing acquisitions even smaller than Documentum. So there’s a real danger it will collapse under its own weight with Documentum now on board.

And the prognosis for IBM, with its FileNet and Content Server offerings, is not much better. In the last 18 months, IBM has rolled ECM software under the Watson umbrella (author note – I think it moved to WebSphere this month), assuming (quite rightly, given a long enough time horizon) that artificial intelligence and big data analytics are where ECM is headed.  The problem is the market isn’t in any way ready for this vision to become reality. Most Fortune 500 firms struggle to do old school, document-based ECM, let alone AI-enabled, big data-driven content management.”

 

TSG Perspective – We completely agree with Joe’s take above.  Lots of articles we have written surrounding Documentum, OpenText and FileNet/IBM where we agree on the points above.

In the article as well as other follow-on discussions, Joe takes the tack that “the right way” to plan for ECM is a combination of Microsoft OneDrive with cloud/SaaS vendors.  In a subsequent discussion, Joe’s thoughts are that OneDrive represents “the place users like to work now (Word and Outlook)” and can replace all the shared drives in the organization.

While we agree with Joe on the state of the major ECM legacy vendors, we disagree on his Microsoft take that “More and more of the bottom 40 percent of content (measured by value and risk) will fall to OneDrive for Business and SharePoint online.”  Both in a later discussion and our joint presentation at the Document Strategy conference back in May, we disagreed with Joe’s take that Microsoft OneDrive would have any more success than SharePoint did back in 2010-2012 timeframe.  (As Alan mentioned in his view of EFSS vendors).  While Joe has clients that are looking at OneDrive from a Shared Drive perspective, we have never seen it replace an ECM system.

Let us know your thoughts below:

Filed Under: Documentum, ECM Landscape, FileNet

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Search

Related Posts

  • The Deep Analysis Podcast – The 11 Billion File Benchmark
  • FileNet – Adding a Modern Interface to a Legacy ECM
  • ECM Roadmap – Thoughts on Planning for the Future
  • 2017 ECM Thoughts and Predictions as well as recap of 2016 postings
  • The Future of ECM
  • ECM Implementations – Why do some fail?
  • Enterprise Content Management – State of the Industry – 2015
  • GKC ARMA Panel Recap – Emerging ECM Trends
  • TSG will be on the GKC ARMA Panel January 8th – Emerging ECM Trends
  • Alfresco Consulting – Documentum Disruptor #2

Recent Posts

  • Alfresco Content Accelerator and Alfresco Enterprise Viewer – Improving User Collaboration Efficiency
  • Alfresco Content Accelerator – Document Notification Distribution Lists
  • Alfresco Webinar – Productivity Anywhere: How modern claim and policy document processing can help the new work-from-home normal succeed
  • Alfresco – Viewing Annotations on Versions
  • Alfresco Content Accelerator – Collaboration Enhancements
stacks-of-paper

11 BILLION DOCUMENT
BENCHMARK
OVERVIEW

Learn how TSG was able to leverage DynamoDB, S3, ElasticSearch & AWS to successfully migrate 11 Billion documents.

Download White Paper

Footer

Search

Contact

22 West Washington St
5th Floor
Chicago, IL 60602

inquiry@tsgrp.com

312.372.7777

Copyright © 2023 · Technology Services Group, Inc. · Log in

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Please accept this site's cookies, but you can opt-out if you wish. Privacy Policy ACCEPT | Cookie settings
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT