• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
TSB Alfresco Cobrand White tagline

Technology Services Group

  • Home
  • Products
    • Alfresco Enterprise Viewer
    • OpenContent Search
    • OpenContent Case
    • OpenContent Forms
    • OpenMigrate
    • OpenContent Web Services
    • OpenCapture
    • OpenOverlay
  • Solutions
    • Alfresco Content Accelerator for Claims Management
      • Claims Demo Series
    • Alfresco Content Accelerator for Policy & Procedure Management
      • Compliance Demo Series
    • OpenContent Accounts Payable
    • OpenContent Contract Management
    • OpenContent Batch Records
    • OpenContent Government
    • OpenContent Corporate Forms
    • OpenContent Construction Management
    • OpenContent Digital Archive
    • OpenContent Human Resources
    • OpenContent Patient Records
  • Platforms
    • Alfresco Consulting
      • Alfresco Case Study – Canadian Museum of Human Rights
      • Alfresco Case Study – New York Philharmonic
      • Alfresco Case Study – New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association
      • Alfresco Case Study – American Society for Clinical Pathology
      • Alfresco Case Study – American Association of Insurance Services
      • Alfresco Case Study – United Cerebral Palsy
    • HBase
    • DynamoDB
    • OpenText & Documentum Consulting
      • Upgrades – A Well Documented Approach
      • Life Science Solutions
        • Life Sciences Project Sampling
    • Veeva Consulting
    • Ephesoft
    • Workshare
  • Case Studies
    • White Papers
    • 11 Billion Document Migration
    • Learning Zone
    • Digital Asset Collection – Canadian Museum of Human Rights
    • Digital Archive and Retrieval – ASCP
    • Digital Archives – New York Philharmonic
    • Insurance Claim Processing – New York Property Insurance
    • Policy Forms Management with Machine Learning – AAIS
    • Liferay and Alfresco Portal – United Cerebral Palsy of Greater Chicago
  • About
    • Contact Us
  • Blog

Box and ECM – What is Box missing?

You are here: Home / Cloud Computing / Box and ECM – What is Box missing?

February 9, 2017

Box and other Enterprise File Sync and Share (EFSS) tools have been very successful filling the next generation document collaboration needs.   Like SharePoint before it, Box and other tools, while being great at sharing files, being successful in collaboration doesn’t necessarily lead to success in ECM.  Back in December of 2016, we wrote an article on 9 market reasons Box would never be a serious ECM alternative

For this post, rather than market thoughts, we will share our experience with some of the ECM deficiencies of Box

Below are typical problems enterprises experience when they with Box when it comes to serious ECM requirements:

I Cannot find document “X” – the need for meta-data search and governance

Box, like shared drives and SharePoint, has limited search options. As the amount of content stored in Box grows, so does the ability to easily find documents. Searching quickly becomes an important feature since navigating through an exponentially growing folder structure will quickly become unrealistic. However, the search capability within Box are very primitive. Full-text search is the primary option, and this type of search brings back too much noise/documents to sift through.  We have discussed it here before – too often users might want a “Google” search but – given ECM needs is that really realistic.  See related post on What to do if you users ask for just a good search. Setting of property/attribute values (Department = “Accounts Payable”) is not an option in Box. Box does provide a Keyword property field. However, the user is not required to complete this field, the user can enter any term they wish creating little added benefit (Box does not have a concept of required drop down metadata fields).  Too often, when users cannot locate the document, they upload another version creating duplicate content and more issues ​down the line (See below for “What version is Final?”)

The Box Sprawl will eventually happen. When content becomes “important” (Final, Approved, > 1 department needing access) it is time to think about a more robust content management system for storage of these documents. True ECM tools can enforce the users to enter in specific property or metadata for a document (Department Name, Product, etc.).  These small, but important steps, have significant positive downstream impact when users want to locate content.

I Need Better Security ​- Governance on document and folder security

Box has limited security options available. Box only supports security at the top folder level. Companies typically require many different security models creating a very flat folder structure, with numerous folders at the first level. As an example, for an HR scenario, if HR creates an “Employee” folder that would contain a subfolder on each employee, any user with access to the “Employee” folder can see all content and subfolders in that Employee folder.  To limit access so each employee can only can see their HR content, Box users would have to create one folder for each employee.

This flat folder structure quickly becomes difficult to navigate and increases user frustration when looking for documents.  The other issue with security is that when a company starts to secure the folders on a per user basis, new users do not realize these “hidden” folders exist and start to recreate the content in a new area causing content duplication.

Files that need to be secured should not be stored in Box. These files should be stored and managed in a true ECM tool where document security is much more flexible, and multiple permutations of security are available (browse, view, annotate, edit, delete, etc.).  Robust ECM tools offer document-level security to meet a variety of different security requirements.

Which Version is Final – Governance on Document LifeCycle

Because the Box interface is a simple Internet Explorer-like interface, users almost always create a new document instance each time a document is modified. As a result, it is common that numerous instances of the same document are stored in Box with file names of “Title-ER comments”, “Title-Final”, “Title-Final Final”, etc.  The added potential that copies of the same document may be stored in multiple locations (See notes above – when a user cannot find a document, they create another instance), which version is final quickly becomes a really big problem.

When documents move past the collaboration stage, they need to be stored in an electronic content management system that contains the tools the enforce versioning and prevent document duplication. Having a single place for Final/Approved documents is an important governance principal that will significantly reduce end user frustration as well as time and money spent searching for the final document.

I need to route a Document for Review/Approval – Workflow Governance

While Box has basic workflow, Box does not have the ability to route a document for review or approval or the ability to gather electronic signatures. Electronic workflow functionality is very complex, so while some EFSS software providers may be looking to add this feature, make sure you understand exactly what can and can’t be done with Workflow. Most workflow tools do not provide ability to gather approvals both concurrently and sequentially or a combination (Route to QA first, followed by all other approvers concurrently). Other key features of a workflow tool would be the ability to easily see who has/has not completed their approval task, the ability to proxy an inbox, or reassign a workflow task when a user is unexpectedly out.  Workflow solutions with limited features will provide a bigger headache than a manual approval process.

Workflow is a core feature in any ECM tool. ECM tools come standard with the functionality mentioned above and have been doing it well for many years.  Box and EFSS tools are just at the beginning stages and will most likely go through years of growing pains before getting it right.

Integration with other applications

When documents need to be accessed by other applications (SAP, Learning Management Systems, etc.), it is well past the time to move it out of Box and into a controlled ECM solution where the secondary application can either link to the content or integrate with your ECM tool.  The Box/EFSS interface, where users make changes as if they were on a local/network drive,  is not secure or controlled enough.

Box and other collaboration tools are not setup to manage final documents; rather, their strength lies in document collaboration simple (think many draft versions).  When sharing content with other systems it is best to make sure that content being stored is final, controlled, and secure.

Summary

While Box and other EFSS software store documents, they typically lack robust document capabilities (search, workflow, properties per document type, etc.) to manage a document throughout its entire lifecycle. Users looking to have better control and management of documents will eventually be disappointed with what Box or other EFSS tool can readily provide.  When Box/EFSS reaches this point, we would recommend looking at a more robust ECM solution.

For additional background information on two leading ECM solutions, download our Documentum Alfresco Comparison Paper.


Free Alfresco Documentum Comparison Whitepaper




Filed Under: Cloud Computing, ECM Solutions

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Search

Related Posts

  • AWS with DynamoDB for Content Management – Reference Architecture & Cost Estimate
  • Google Cloud with BigTable for Content Management – Reference Architecture & Cost Estimate
  • Reference Architecture for Content Management on Azure HDInsight with HBase
  • DynamoDB 11 Billion Benchmark 11 Thousand Concurrent Users Success!!! – Lessons Learned
  • Doculabs Upgrades Alfresco – Recent Review
  • Alfresco and AWS – 20 Security Tips
  • OpenAnnotate – Beta Availability as a service on Amazon Web Services
  • Microsoft Azure HDInsight for ECM on Hadoop
  • Capture 2.0 – Document Classification with Machine Learning
  • Alfresco Ranked a Leader in Independent Content Management Market Analysis

Recent Posts

  • Alfresco Content Accelerator and Alfresco Enterprise Viewer – Improving User Collaboration Efficiency
  • Alfresco Content Accelerator – Document Notification Distribution Lists
  • Alfresco Webinar – Productivity Anywhere: How modern claim and policy document processing can help the new work-from-home normal succeed
  • Alfresco – Viewing Annotations on Versions
  • Alfresco Content Accelerator – Collaboration Enhancements
stacks-of-paper

11 BILLION DOCUMENT
BENCHMARK
OVERVIEW

Learn how TSG was able to leverage DynamoDB, S3, ElasticSearch & AWS to successfully migrate 11 Billion documents.

Download White Paper

Footer

Search

Contact

22 West Washington St
5th Floor
Chicago, IL 60602

inquiry@tsgrp.com

312.372.7777

Copyright © 2023 · Technology Services Group, Inc. · Log in

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Please accept this site's cookies, but you can opt-out if you wish. Privacy Policy ACCEPT | Cookie settings
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT