• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
TSB Alfresco Cobrand White tagline

Technology Services Group

  • Home
  • Products
    • Alfresco Enterprise Viewer
    • OpenContent Search
    • OpenContent Case
    • OpenContent Forms
    • OpenMigrate
    • OpenContent Web Services
    • OpenCapture
    • OpenOverlay
  • Solutions
    • Alfresco Content Accelerator for Claims Management
      • Claims Demo Series
    • Alfresco Content Accelerator for Policy & Procedure Management
      • Compliance Demo Series
    • OpenContent Accounts Payable
    • OpenContent Contract Management
    • OpenContent Batch Records
    • OpenContent Government
    • OpenContent Corporate Forms
    • OpenContent Construction Management
    • OpenContent Digital Archive
    • OpenContent Human Resources
    • OpenContent Patient Records
  • Platforms
    • Alfresco Consulting
      • Alfresco Case Study – Canadian Museum of Human Rights
      • Alfresco Case Study – New York Philharmonic
      • Alfresco Case Study – New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association
      • Alfresco Case Study – American Society for Clinical Pathology
      • Alfresco Case Study – American Association of Insurance Services
      • Alfresco Case Study – United Cerebral Palsy
    • HBase
    • DynamoDB
    • OpenText & Documentum Consulting
      • Upgrades – A Well Documented Approach
      • Life Science Solutions
        • Life Sciences Project Sampling
    • Veeva Consulting
    • Ephesoft
    • Workshare
  • Case Studies
    • White Papers
    • 11 Billion Document Migration
    • Learning Zone
    • Digital Asset Collection – Canadian Museum of Human Rights
    • Digital Archive and Retrieval – ASCP
    • Digital Archives – New York Philharmonic
    • Insurance Claim Processing – New York Property Insurance
    • Policy Forms Management with Machine Learning – AAIS
    • Liferay and Alfresco Portal – United Cerebral Palsy of Greater Chicago
  • About
    • Contact Us
  • Blog

Documentum – Dell buys EMC – Thoughts as the smoke clears

You are here: Home / Documentum / Documentum – Dell buys EMC – Thoughts as the smoke clears

October 19, 2015

Announced last Monday October 12th, Dell is buying EMC for 67 billion, the biggest tech merger ever.  As we mentioned on Monday, TSG wanted to share some of detailed thoughts with customers and potential customers regarding the merger and the effect on Documentum.

Why did Dell buy EMC?

Earlier in the year, it seemed like EMC was in discussions with HP before talking with Dell.  From a variety of posts on the web and press release, the best article I thought was e-week which presented:

  • Dell wants VMware, owned by EMC. Thirty-five percent of EMC’s $52.55 billion market cap (or about $18.3 billion) belongs to VMware alone.
  • Dell also wants Pivotal to add to its growing Dell Software division. Pivotal is one of the most promising young software companies out there.
  • EMC wants to stay intact, no matter what.
  • Both companies need help right now against an onslaught of younger, imaginative, fast-moving newcomers in cloud storage, cloud computing, security and a number of other sectors. When lots of piranhas are constantly biting at a bigger but slower target, eventually they will consume it. EMC and Dell joining forces at this time would fortify themselves for a longer period against these adversaries.
  • Both are veteran, been-through-the-wars companies that once owned their respective markets (EMC in storage, and Dell in PCs). Actually, EMC is still the global storage hardware leader, but with the advent of cloud infrastructure and a long list of new-gen competitors, sales have leveled off in the last two years and the big ship’s listing. Dell remains in the world’s top 3 in terms of selling desktop and laptop PCs. So both companies aren’t exactly destitute.

Nowhere above does it mention Documentum or ECD (Enterprise Content Division) that includes Documentum.

What does it mean for Documentum in the short-term?

In discussion with a variety of sources, we would anticipate that:

  1. Documentum/ECD will be left alone while the deal closes. Most estimations target mid-2016 for the deal to close.
  2. EMC/Dell will have layoffs to reduce costs and for “synergy”.
  3. Documentum (and ECD) will be sold/spun off after the deal closes.

In the past, we have said multiple times that Documentum would not be sold off both in 2012 and 2014.  We are pretty confident this time around in that:

  • Joe Tucci is not running the Dell/EMC combination and is retiring.
  • EMC sold off Syncplicity earlier this year in July.
  • Given the huge amount of debt Dell is getting to pursue this deal, they will want to pay it down with pieces that aren’t core and ECD is clearly one of those pieces.

In the end, it puts Documentum (and their people) in a weird limbo land while the deal is closing.  Some things to consider:

  • Project Horizon – As we mentioned at EMC World, project Horizon will take considerable investment. Plan on that investment stalling or fading as Documentum awaits a buyer to determine if it is strategic or overlaps the buyer’s offering.  ECD had been hinting lately the project horizon wouldn’t replace Documentum anyway.
  • Webtop/D2/xCP – As we recently pointed out, D2 seems to have some underlying scaling issues.  Will the D2 issues as well as xCP/Webtop issues be fixed?  Will products be improved?  We would probably recommend that clients, during the limbo time, just focus on what the product does today.
  • Who is the buyer?  The most disconcerting item is trying to guess who the buyer will be. Key to product understanding will be which buyer is picked and why they are buying.

In order for Documentum to receive a buyer that “saves” the product, the buyer needs to be focused on continuing to evolve the product and support the engineers/consultants.  The buyer should also bring a client base that could be a new customer stream for Documentum.  In the past, we have hinted that established software firms that lack ECM and have a locked-in large client base (ex: SAP) would be best.

What about the People?

From both the limbo of the acquisition as well as the concern about focus, many at ECD/Documentum will be either let go or will look for other work.  Some items to consider:

  • EMC Options were one major reason many were staying at Documentum. With those options vested (Dell is private), will employees leave to explore other alternatives?
  • California – For the engineers, Pleasanton has never been a draw as it isn’t really San Francisco. Would engineers (now vested) look for alternatives?  With California’s no non-compete law, there is nothing preventing employees from considering all alternatives.
  • Consulting – as we mentioned, many of Documentum’s products are really consulting offerings. Will consultants stay and become Dell Consulting?

The Cultural impact of Layoffs

Every article on the merger has mentioned that layoffs are coming.  While most focus on the bigger work force on the EMC side, Michael Dell on a media call about the merger said.

“There are certainly some cost synergies — we’re not going to tell you that there aren’t,” said Dell, who declined to get into specifics, other than to say this: “I think there are some other companies in our industries that are maybe far better at reducing headcount then we are.”

More from Forbes

“A combination of EMC and Dell could cost 35,560 people their jobs — 20% of their combined employee base of about 177,800 people. EMC had 68,000 employees at the beginning of 2015 and laid off 1,500 in the first quarter of 2015, according to EMC. Dell had 111,300 last October according to Forbes.”

ECD will be asked to reduce costs and, for a software firm, the bulk of those costs are people.  Even before layoffs begin, fear of layoffs is incredibly de-motivating for staff.  Thoughts can include:

  • “Will I be here tomorrow? Should I start looking for a job?”  Often times this is thought by the best people, the ones that can easily find another job, and they move on before the layoffs even begin.
  • “Should I put my best effort into this task?” Particularly on development efforts that are months away from being complete, should I put in the extra work to finish/fix products that I might not get to finish?
  • “You’re still there?” Peer groups can be brutal on those that stay.  From a culture side, it can be very difficult to be the last man standing while friends and co-workers have moved on to new jobs.

The Dell Brand – “Dude, you’re getting a Dell”

Software engineers want more than just a place to work.  Most want to be proud of where they work and what they do.  Documentum and EMC had a certain vibe as innovators of document management (Documentum) and one of the four horsemen of the internet (EMC).  Dell just doesn’t have that same vibe and the brand is associated with cheap PCs.  As a consultant/engineer, saying:

  • “I work for EMC/Documentum” will often get the response of “what do you do for EMC/Documentum?”
  • “I work for Dell” will get the response of “you fix PCs?”.

One of the parody videos (from Conan O’Brien) that has been circulating around the ECM environment best displays thoughts on Dell compared to a Jobs/Apple coolness:

Summary 

One of our clients approached us with a more optimistic approach – “this could be a good thing for Documentum”.  For that to hold true:

  • Documentum engineering and consulting would need to survive the layoffs and the next six+ months in limbo as they await a buyer.
  • The buyer would have to want to invest in Documentum’s future rather than just milk the existing revenue stream.
  • The buyer would need to bring others positives (existing clients, funding, technology) to Documentum to continue to evolve the product.

For a comparison, when EMC sold Syncplicity earlier this year:

  • The head of Syncplicity, Jeetu Patel, left for Box.
  • The buyer was a venture capital firm, Skyview Capital, that did not bring clients or technology.

At this time, we would anticipate that the buyer of Documentum/ECD would be similar.  Let us know your thoughts below:

Filed Under: Documentum, ECM Landscape, News

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Kunal says

    October 19, 2015 at 11:43 am

    Documentum is always been a profitable source for emc and has vast installed user base.
    If dell really need to compete with HP and IBM for enterprise level then ECM will be having significant role as well and Dell has no presence in this area.

    Reply
  2. TSG Dave says

    October 19, 2015 at 1:28 pm

    Kunal – thanks for your response.

    My thoughts are that, while Dell wants to play on the enterprise level, it is really on the server hardware rather than the applications, including ECM.

    I stand by my points that the significant issue is keeping the people given that infrastructure focus and the Dell brand.

    My two cents,

    Dave

    Reply
    • Kunal says

      October 19, 2015 at 8:47 pm

      This acquistion is focused on software driven business where dell has insignificant presence .They know that hardware business will be almost degrade going forward and marginal profit is also more in application/software driven for dell .
      I personally dont think abt selling ecd and as far as culture is mentioned that will come to know how new organization culture comes up post formation of dell emc.

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Everyone is talking about Documentum | ECM Reads says:
    October 31, 2015 at 3:52 am

    […] Documentum – Dell buys EMC – Thoughts as the smoke clears […]

    Reply
  2. Documentum – Why is EMC struggling to sell it? – Technology Services Group says:
    June 28, 2016 at 12:43 pm

    […] the announcement of Dell buying EMC back in October of 2015, TSG, as well as most other analysts, has been confident that EMC would […]

    Reply
  3. Documentum sold to OpenText – Detailed Analysis and Predictions – Technology Services Group says:
    September 15, 2016 at 6:28 pm

    […] October 2015 when we first wrote our thoughts about the eventual sale of Documentum we had said that Documentum needed to get away from Dell and, for the purchase to be a good thing […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Search

Related Posts

  • EMC World 2016 – Day 2 – ECD Roadmap and Vision
  • Documentum after the EMC fire sale – it’s all about the brand
  • Dell buys EMC – What does it mean for Documentum?
  • Documentum – EMC Sale of Syncplicity
  • Documentum – EMC World 2015 – Recap – Cadence Improvements with new repository on the “Horizon”
  • Documentum – EMC World 2015 – Rohit Ghai President EMC Enterprise Content Division – What’s Next
  • Documentum – EMC World 2015 – Momentum – Prepping for the Show
  • Documentum / IIG / ECD? – EMC Announces 2014 Earnings, Layoffs and thoughts on a spin-off
  • Documentum and Alfresco – What are some of the bigger differences?
  • Documentum 8 – Why and When, thoughts on the Documentum Roadmap

Recent Posts

  • Alfresco Content Accelerator and Alfresco Enterprise Viewer – Improving User Collaboration Efficiency
  • Alfresco Content Accelerator – Document Notification Distribution Lists
  • Alfresco Webinar – Productivity Anywhere: How modern claim and policy document processing can help the new work-from-home normal succeed
  • Alfresco – Viewing Annotations on Versions
  • Alfresco Content Accelerator – Collaboration Enhancements
stacks-of-paper

11 BILLION DOCUMENT
BENCHMARK
OVERVIEW

Learn how TSG was able to leverage DynamoDB, S3, ElasticSearch & AWS to successfully migrate 11 Billion documents.

Download White Paper

Footer

Search

Contact

22 West Washington St
5th Floor
Chicago, IL 60602

inquiry@tsgrp.com

312.372.7777

Copyright © 2023 · Technology Services Group, Inc. · Log in

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Please accept this site's cookies, but you can opt-out if you wish. Privacy Policy ACCEPT | Cookie settings
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT