• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
TSB Alfresco Cobrand White tagline

Technology Services Group

  • Home
  • Products
    • Alfresco Enterprise Viewer
    • OpenContent Search
    • OpenContent Case
    • OpenContent Forms
    • OpenMigrate
    • OpenContent Web Services
    • OpenCapture
    • OpenOverlay
  • Solutions
    • Alfresco Content Accelerator for Claims Management
      • Claims Demo Series
    • Alfresco Content Accelerator for Policy & Procedure Management
      • Compliance Demo Series
    • OpenContent Accounts Payable
    • OpenContent Contract Management
    • OpenContent Batch Records
    • OpenContent Government
    • OpenContent Corporate Forms
    • OpenContent Construction Management
    • OpenContent Digital Archive
    • OpenContent Human Resources
    • OpenContent Patient Records
  • Platforms
    • Alfresco Consulting
      • Alfresco Case Study – Canadian Museum of Human Rights
      • Alfresco Case Study – New York Philharmonic
      • Alfresco Case Study – New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association
      • Alfresco Case Study – American Society for Clinical Pathology
      • Alfresco Case Study – American Association of Insurance Services
      • Alfresco Case Study – United Cerebral Palsy
    • HBase
    • DynamoDB
    • OpenText & Documentum Consulting
      • Upgrades – A Well Documented Approach
      • Life Science Solutions
        • Life Sciences Project Sampling
    • Veeva Consulting
    • Ephesoft
    • Workshare
  • Case Studies
    • White Papers
    • 11 Billion Document Migration
    • Learning Zone
    • Digital Asset Collection – Canadian Museum of Human Rights
    • Digital Archive and Retrieval – ASCP
    • Digital Archives – New York Philharmonic
    • Insurance Claim Processing – New York Property Insurance
    • Policy Forms Management with Machine Learning – AAIS
    • Liferay and Alfresco Portal – United Cerebral Palsy of Greater Chicago
  • About
    • Contact Us
  • Blog

BPM/Workflow – Why “I want the user to define the form and workflow” doesn’t always work

You are here: Home / Activiti / BPM/Workflow – Why “I want the user to define the form and workflow” doesn’t always work

August 11, 2015

We had a call last week with a client evaluating form and workflow as part of an overall BPM effort.  In evaluating solutions, often we will see technical resources push for a solution “that allows the users to build their own forms and workflow without any IT involvement”.  This post will discuss the issues of user constructed workflows as well as share best practices.

Empower the user – Why Not?

For years, clients have liked our rules-based approach to defining form and workflow as part of our Active Wizard projects.  For multiple clients, we have even done multi-day administrator training on best practices on how to design form and workflow activities.  This approach has worked well for many client implementations.  However, some of our observations against extending this to end users have included:

  • User Driven and IT – When you look at many of the user driven IT tools, whether that be basic Access Databases, Lotus Notes, SharePoint, Salesforce or other tools that promoted user solutions, have they worked long term?  Many times the end solutions can be jumbled as some users put more time into defining things but often lack the governance or centralized coordination.
  • IT Support – IT would like users to build forms and workflows so they don’t have to provide a service more than supporting the base platform. With robust Enterprise BPM tools, support isn’t tied to the platform but how it is used.  IT can be quickly frustrated as they are brought in to debug form and workflow that they didn’t build rather than just supporting the base product.
  • Users don’t want to build form and workflows – Most users have regular responsibilities that, given a typical client, expand past their normal 8 hours per day. Learning a tool and building/debugging all of the options for a robust tool gets them frustrated.  They would rather delegate this activity and monitor progress.

Typically users don’t have the time, inclination or focus to truly engineer business processes without some kind of guidance and support.

Enter the Business Analyst

We have seen users augmented with business analysts (typically from IT) successfully deploy user-driven form and workflow solutions.  The business analyst brings:

  • An understanding of the BPM tool
  • Governance and support responsibility for all form and workflow
  • Experience implementing form and workflow solutions
  • Best practices based on those experiences

We have seen business analysts coach users to avoid typical workflow mistakes.  Some obvious examples include:

  • Overuse of Group Inboxes – The logic typically goes “if we send it to the group, it will be approved/processed faster”. In reality, this logic only works in transactional groups that are processing workflow tasks all day.  In use cases where users are not processing workflow tasks all day, group-based tasks are almost always slower as there is no accountability for group members who would rather work on directly assigned items.
  • Overuse of data collection – Typical users will ask for too many data points and fields rather than focus on allowing the user to complete the form quickly and efficiently.
  • Design overly complex processes – whether to have multiple templates or one giant template can be a struggle for business users.   Knowledge of when and where to use multiple templates one single templates comes with experience.
  • Designing with only one form or workflow process in mind – Users are typically focused on the problem at hand.  Understandably, they will seek to build a form and workflow process that fits solves the given problem.  However, an experienced business analyst may be able to find natural extension points, and design the form and workflow to accommodate future business processes or requests that aren’t immediately apparent.

Business Analyst and User Combination

When done efficiently, forms and workflow can be set up with both involvement of the business analyst and the user.  Users will:

  • Describe the process, document and data requirements to the business analyst
  • Participate in the design and building of the form and workflow solution
  • Test the form and workflow solution.

The Business Analysts will:

  • Document the business process
  • Construct quick prototypes for user review
  • Build and support the eventual solution

Summary

While IT would love users to build and support their BPM solutions by constructing their own form and workflow requirements, a best practice includes bringing in a business analyst is needed to assist the users and guide and support the use of the tool.

Let us know your thoughts below.

Filed Under: Activiti, Workflow

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Search

Related Posts

  • Alfresco and Box – An Integrated Approach for Collaboration and Approval
  • Documentum and Alfresco BPM – Activiti and Active Wizard 5.0
  • Activiti BPM Engine – Active Wizard 5.0
  • Migrating from Documentum to Alfresco – Controlled Documents – Introducing Active Wizard 5.0
  • Document Review and Approval – Why Form AND Workflow are so important
  • Alfresco and Angular 2.0: Technical First Look
  • Documentum or Alfresco – TSG Contract Management Solution
  • Alfresco Activiti – Overview of BPMN Suite
  • Productization of Alfresco Activiti (and the Standalone Activiti BPMN Suite)
  • Alfresco or Documentum Collaborative Document Reviews with OpenAnnotate

Recent Posts

  • Alfresco Content Accelerator and Alfresco Enterprise Viewer – Improving User Collaboration Efficiency
  • Alfresco Content Accelerator – Document Notification Distribution Lists
  • Alfresco Webinar – Productivity Anywhere: How modern claim and policy document processing can help the new work-from-home normal succeed
  • Alfresco – Viewing Annotations on Versions
  • Alfresco Content Accelerator – Collaboration Enhancements
stacks-of-paper

11 BILLION DOCUMENT
BENCHMARK
OVERVIEW

Learn how TSG was able to leverage DynamoDB, S3, ElasticSearch & AWS to successfully migrate 11 Billion documents.

Download White Paper

Footer

Search

Contact

22 West Washington St
5th Floor
Chicago, IL 60602

inquiry@tsgrp.com

312.372.7777

Copyright © 2023 · Technology Services Group, Inc. · Log in

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Please accept this site's cookies, but you can opt-out if you wish. Privacy Policy ACCEPT | Cookie settings
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT