• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
TSB Alfresco Cobrand White tagline

Technology Services Group

  • Home
  • Products
    • Alfresco Enterprise Viewer
    • OpenContent Search
    • OpenContent Case
    • OpenContent Forms
    • OpenMigrate
    • OpenContent Web Services
    • OpenCapture
    • OpenOverlay
  • Solutions
    • Alfresco Content Accelerator for Claims Management
      • Claims Demo Series
    • Alfresco Content Accelerator for Policy & Procedure Management
      • Compliance Demo Series
    • OpenContent Accounts Payable
    • OpenContent Contract Management
    • OpenContent Batch Records
    • OpenContent Government
    • OpenContent Corporate Forms
    • OpenContent Construction Management
    • OpenContent Digital Archive
    • OpenContent Human Resources
    • OpenContent Patient Records
  • Platforms
    • Alfresco Consulting
      • Alfresco Case Study – Canadian Museum of Human Rights
      • Alfresco Case Study – New York Philharmonic
      • Alfresco Case Study – New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association
      • Alfresco Case Study – American Society for Clinical Pathology
      • Alfresco Case Study – American Association of Insurance Services
      • Alfresco Case Study – United Cerebral Palsy
    • HBase
    • DynamoDB
    • OpenText & Documentum Consulting
      • Upgrades – A Well Documented Approach
      • Life Science Solutions
        • Life Sciences Project Sampling
    • Veeva Consulting
    • Ephesoft
    • Workshare
  • Case Studies
    • White Papers
    • 11 Billion Document Migration
    • Learning Zone
    • Digital Asset Collection – Canadian Museum of Human Rights
    • Digital Archive and Retrieval – ASCP
    • Digital Archives – New York Philharmonic
    • Insurance Claim Processing – New York Property Insurance
    • Policy Forms Management with Machine Learning – AAIS
    • Liferay and Alfresco Portal – United Cerebral Palsy of Greater Chicago
  • About
    • Contact Us
  • Blog

Documentum Contributor Interfaces – D2, Webtop, HPI, and xCP

You are here: Home / Documentum / D2 / Documentum Contributor Interfaces – D2, Webtop, HPI, and xCP

March 5, 2012

Part 1 – Document Creation, Checkout, and Checkin

After receiving some positive feedback on a previous post comparing the search functionality of Webtop, D2, HPI, and xCP, we decided to continue with our product comparison.   This post will compare Webtop, D2, HPI and xCP for

From our experience, the user interface for consumers (those who use the system primarily for searching and retrieving content) is the most important when evaluating the overall success of an ECM implementation.  As with the consumer functionality, we’ve posted a video comparing the contributor functionality available in Webtop, D2, HPI, and xCP.  Once again, each interface was evaluated based on what was configurable using the out-of-the-box product, without any coding or customization.  This post focuses on some of the highlights of document creation, checkout, and checkin.

Content Transfer Methods

One of the major differences we found when comparing the contributor functionality of Webtop, D2, HPI, and xCP is the method that each product uses for transferring content to and from the repository for checkin, checkout, and import operations.  Each product utilizes browser plugins to manage various components of content transfer.

Before diving into the details of each product, we thought we’d share some thoughts about browser plugins.  Plugins, in general, help to enhance the user experience by providing functionality that’s impossible to achieve by just using HTML.  Plugins are commonly used for animations, streaming video, and multi-file upload.  Plugins generally utilize the ActiveX framework, Java applets, or Adobe Flash.

As useful as they are, plugins can pose problems because they require software to be downloaded to the client PC.  These downloads can be difficult to rollout on an enterprise level due to security restrictions.  After all, plugins inherently provide web applications access to the file system on the client PC, which is often a large security hurdle to get over.

Plugins can also be problematic when considering the compatibility between versions, operating systems, and browsers.  In corporations where all PCs have the same image and installs and updates are centrally managed, it’s less of an issue because all PCs have the same software installed.  More often than not, a common PC image for an entire company is never a reality because some users are granted admin rights to their PCs.  Many companies also make their ECM web interfaces available over an extranet, opening up the user base to a variety of browsers, operating systems, Java, and Flash versions.

Webtop and xCP utilize Unified Content Facilities (UCF) to perform content transfer.  UCF is a Java applet developed by EMC and is used by every content transfer operation in Webtop and xCP.  These operations include checkin, checkout, cancel checkout, edit, import, and export.  UCF allows Webtop to behave more like a desktop application.

The Good

    • Users do not have to specify a folder location when editing and checking out content
    • Users do not have to browse for files on their PC when checking in content
    • When viewing non-PDF content (Word, Excel, etc.), content is downloaded and launched in the native application without having to save a local copy first
    • Multiple files can be imported in a single operation
    • Files can be dragged and dropped into the browser for importing
    • UCF utilizes Java, which is supported by most modern browsers (Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome, Safari)

The Bad

    • UCF requires that the client PC have the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) installed
    • UCF is only supported on certain versions of the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) and has proven to be incompatible with unsupported JRE versions
    • Elevated browser security may be required to install the UCF plugin
    • Most users have grown accustomed to working with web based applications.  Some of the desktop-like functionality provided by UCF may go unused (drag and drop) or even confuse users (“I just checked out a document, but where did it go on my hard drive?”)

D2 is built entirely within an ActiveX plugin, utilizing none of the browser’s built-in functionality other than launching the ActiveX plugin.  Because D2 is built entirely as an ActiveX application, it looks and behaves more like a desktop application than a web application.

The Good

    • Users do not have to specify a folder location when editing and checking out content
    • Users do not have to browse for files on their PC when checking in content
    • When viewing non-PDF content (Word, Excel, etc.), content is downloaded and launched in the native application without having to save a local copy first
    • Multiple files can be imported in a single operation
    • Files can be dragged and dropped into the browser for importing

The Bad

    • D2 utilizes ActiveX, which is only supported in Microsoft Internet Explorer running on a Windows operating system
    • Admin privileges are required to install the D2 ActiveX plugin on the client machine
    • Most users have grown accustomed to working with web based applications.  Some of the desktop-like functionality provided by D2 may go unused or even confuse users.

High Performance Interface (HPI) is built almost entirely using web technologies (HTML, JavaScript, and CSS).  HPI uses a Flash plugin for multi-file upload only.

The Good

    • With exception of using Adobe Flash Player for multi-file upload, HPI does not require any software or plugin installation
    • Adobe Flash Player is supported by most modern browsers (Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome, Safari
    • HPI provides a user experience that is aligned with most other web applications
    • Multiple files can be imported in a single operation

The Bad

    • Users see an “Open/Save” dialog when checking out content, requiring them to specify a location to save the content to while editing
    • Users must browse for a file on their PC when checking in content
    • With exception of PDF content that launches in Adobe Reader, users have to go through an “Open/Save” dialog when viewing content
    • Drag and drop features are not supported for import

Overall Thoughts

When considering options in a Documentum contributor interface, it’s also important to consider any plugins that need to be installed with the product.  Plugins should be evaluated not only on the user experience, but also on security and the OS and software requirements of the application.

While the desktop-like user experience that Webtop, D2, and xCP try to deliver offers a lot of features, it begs the question of whether these interfaces are hanging on to old desktop applications features.  Does anyone remember WorkSpace and Desktop Client?  Many of today’s business application users are accustomed to working in streamlined web applications like HPI that require manually saving and uploading files from their PC.

Hopefully this post has shed some light on some of the options available for Documentum contributor interfaces.  Look for future posts that compare additional contributor functionality of Webtop, D2, HPI, and xCP.

Filed Under: D2, Documentum, OpenContent Management Suite, Product Suite, Webtop, xCP

Reader Interactions

Trackbacks

  1. Documentum – EMC World – Momentum 2012 – Early Predictions « TSG Blog says:
    March 6, 2012 at 1:28 pm

    […] https://www.tsgrp.com/2012/03/05/documentum-contributor-interfaces-d2-webtop-hpi-and-xcp/ […]

    Reply
  2. Documentum Webtop 5.3 running on Documentum Content Server 6.x « TSG Blog says:
    March 15, 2012 at 2:57 pm

    […] any significant differences as an alternative to Webtop (see Tony’s reviews – search – contributor – for more detail).  Clients that purchased Webtop licenses also had concerns about being […]

    Reply
  3. Working with Folders in Documentum User Interfaces – D2, Webtop, HPI, and xCP « TSG Blog says:
    March 16, 2012 at 2:01 pm

    […] folders to classify content in an ECM system.  Similar to our previous articles about consumer and contributor functionality, this article will compare the out-of-the-box features with regards to folders that […]

    Reply
  4. Documentum D2 – Summary of Previous Posts « TSG Blog says:
    March 26, 2012 at 11:04 am

    […] Documentum Contributor Interfaces – D2, Webtop, HPI, and xCP and the accompanying screen cam give a similar overview of D2, but from the prospective of users who mainly use the system for creating new and modifying existing content. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Search

Related Posts

  • Documentum and Alfresco – Open Source Interface – Preview of HPI 2.1
  • Working with Folders in Documentum User Interfaces – D2, Webtop, HPI, and xCP
  • Documentum – Top Tips for 2016
  • Enterprise Content Management Predictions – 2015
  • Alfresco or Documentum Collaborative Document Reviews with OpenAnnotate
  • Documentum or Alfresco – Redacting Sensitive Information with OpenRedact
  • Documentum – Momentum EMC World 2014 Recap – Some bunts, hits as well as some swings
  • Documentum – End of Service Life of PDF Annotation Services – OpenAnnotate as a Replacement
  • Documentum, SharePoint, Alfresco – Document Control for Life Sciences
  • Documentum and Alfresco – Evolution of the HPI Desktop for Case Management by Insurance Clients

Recent Posts

  • Alfresco Content Accelerator and Alfresco Enterprise Viewer – Improving User Collaboration Efficiency
  • Alfresco Content Accelerator – Document Notification Distribution Lists
  • Alfresco Webinar – Productivity Anywhere: How modern claim and policy document processing can help the new work-from-home normal succeed
  • Alfresco – Viewing Annotations on Versions
  • Alfresco Content Accelerator – Collaboration Enhancements
stacks-of-paper

11 BILLION DOCUMENT
BENCHMARK
OVERVIEW

Learn how TSG was able to leverage DynamoDB, S3, ElasticSearch & AWS to successfully migrate 11 Billion documents.

Download White Paper

Footer

Search

Contact

22 West Washington St
5th Floor
Chicago, IL 60602

inquiry@tsgrp.com

312.372.7777

Copyright © 2023 · Technology Services Group, Inc. · Log in

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Please accept this site's cookies, but you can opt-out if you wish. Privacy Policy ACCEPT | Cookie settings
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT