• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
TSB Alfresco Cobrand White tagline

Technology Services Group

  • Home
  • Products
    • Alfresco Enterprise Viewer
    • OpenContent Search
    • OpenContent Case
    • OpenContent Forms
    • OpenMigrate
    • OpenContent Web Services
    • OpenCapture
    • OpenOverlay
  • Solutions
    • Alfresco Content Accelerator for Claims Management
      • Claims Demo Series
    • Alfresco Content Accelerator for Policy & Procedure Management
      • Compliance Demo Series
    • OpenContent Accounts Payable
    • OpenContent Contract Management
    • OpenContent Batch Records
    • OpenContent Government
    • OpenContent Corporate Forms
    • OpenContent Construction Management
    • OpenContent Digital Archive
    • OpenContent Human Resources
    • OpenContent Patient Records
  • Platforms
    • Alfresco Consulting
      • Alfresco Case Study – Canadian Museum of Human Rights
      • Alfresco Case Study – New York Philharmonic
      • Alfresco Case Study – New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association
      • Alfresco Case Study – American Society for Clinical Pathology
      • Alfresco Case Study – American Association of Insurance Services
      • Alfresco Case Study – United Cerebral Palsy
    • HBase
    • DynamoDB
    • OpenText & Documentum Consulting
      • Upgrades – A Well Documented Approach
      • Life Science Solutions
        • Life Sciences Project Sampling
    • Veeva Consulting
    • Ephesoft
    • Workshare
  • Case Studies
    • White Papers
    • 11 Billion Document Migration
    • Learning Zone
    • Digital Asset Collection – Canadian Museum of Human Rights
    • Digital Archive and Retrieval – ASCP
    • Digital Archives – New York Philharmonic
    • Insurance Claim Processing – New York Property Insurance
    • Policy Forms Management with Machine Learning – AAIS
    • Liferay and Alfresco Portal – United Cerebral Palsy of Greater Chicago
  • About
    • Contact Us
  • Blog

Alfresco versus Documentum for Controlled Documentation

You are here: Home / Alfresco / Alfresco versus Documentum for Controlled Documentation

January 3, 2012

Some of our larger regulated industry (Pharma, Utliity…) clients are looking into Alfresco to see if it could be used to manage their controlled documentation and potentially replace Documentum.  This post will present our most recent in-depth analysis based on common document control requirements.

The first question we commonly hear is: Does Alfresco contain all the necessary functionality?

The short answer is yes. Alfresco does contain all of the key content management components (versioning, lifecycle, workflow, security, etc.) that Documentum and other ECM solutions contain (See Table Below).  To prove this out we recently took our High Performance Interface (HPI) and hooked it up to run on Alfresco.  The demonstration, which will be posted in our knowledge base shortly, really shows off that Alfresco can handle the typical controlled documentation requirements. It also shows off how the user can be unaware of the technology platform that is being leveraged… HPI/Alfresco looks just like HPI/Documentum!

Many of our clients have customized the OOTB Documentum interfaces to enable business specific functionality (only allow delegation of a workflow task to users in my groups, specialized linked CR processing, etc.). Do not expect Alfresco to contain OOTB logic to support these types of customized business processes.  Alfresco does have the framework (rules, actions, web services architecture, spring, etc.) to enable business-specific rules to be integrated as well as integrations with other third party products.

This table lists the Alfresco functionality evaluated. For more detailed information on any of the topics below, feel free to contact us.

Functionality Alfresco Contains Functionality 3rd Party Add On Notes
Security X Supports role-based security, folder inheritance
Object Model, Properties, Value Assistance X Supports custom object types, properties, repeating, required, value assistance, etc. Note Alfresco’s use of aspects and data lists to make maintenance easier
Searching X Supports full text and property searches, wild cards, saved searches.
Reporting X Cognos, Custom, Business Objects, etc.
File Transfer Protocol X Uses standard HTTP file transfer protocol rather than UCF transfer applet that Documentum utilizes
Versioning X Supports major and minor versions
Audit Trail X Contains a built in audit trail or user can write events to own audit table
Linking X Supports peer-to-peer and parent- child linking
Renditions X Can convert native file to PDF when a specific action is performed  (i.e.  check-in). Renditions stored as association or within a property
Rendering X X Open Office, or others can be linked in
Lifecycles X Lifecycle state tracked in a property. Allows for more flexibility.
Workflow X Utilizes Activiti. Supports parallel and/or serial workflows, proxy, delegation, email notifications, notification for overdue or almost-due tasks, Part 11 Compliance, etc.
Annotations X OpenAnnotate, Others
Overlay X OpenOverlay, Others
Configuration  Ability X Many options in Alfresco platform utilizing rules, action, Spring , XML framework
Records Management X Alfresco contains a separate  Records Manager product that is DoD 5015.02 certified.
Mobile X Alfresco is already wired for simple mobile integration (RESTful API, HTTP transfer protocol, etc.)
XML  X X Supports storing of XML content. Can integrate with XML authoring tools
Advanced Publishing X Custom job working with rendering solution
Advanced Forms X ActiveWizard, others…

Filed Under: Alfresco, Document Control, Documentum

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Etienne Jouvin says

    January 3, 2012 at 2:18 pm

    Hye.

    About File Transfert Protocol, I think this is missing some point:
    Alfresco uses Flash in the application Share.
    But, you can also play with CIFS, Webdav, FTP. You can also contribute by an email to a specific mailbox.

    Regards.

    Etienne Jouvin

    Reply
  2. Paras says

    January 4, 2012 at 3:16 am

    Does Alfresco support Trusted Content Services style ACLs – with required groups and required group sets?

    – Paras

    Reply
  3. Ellen says

    January 4, 2012 at 9:53 am

    Our clients have used TCS in the past for both e-Signatures and encryption. Not one client uses required groups and group sets within their implementation. Alfresco does contain the capability to support both e-sigs with 3rd party software add-ons and encryption will be supported in Alfresco’s 4.0 release. Alfresco does this without using required groups and group set functionality. Feel free to contact me with any further questions.

    – Ellen

    Reply
    • ukdavo says

      January 4, 2012 at 6:16 pm

      Although not OOTB Alfresco provides developers with the ability to customise the authorisation mechanism. You’ll have to hack away at the Alfresco/Acegi stuff (security interceptors, etc). This approach will support all clients such as Share, WEBAD, CIFS, etc as it’s done at the repository layer.

      This is the approach that the Records Management module takes. I’ve implemented similar functionality to required groups for a client that wanted a very specific security system.

      Reply
    • Lourens says

      June 3, 2013 at 8:10 am

      Hi Ellen,

      How can one achieve this requirement in Alfresco? Previously in Documentum we added the required group, e.g. Secret to the ACL assigned to the content, to only allow users with security clearances of Secret to access this document.

      Reply
      • eryan says

        June 3, 2013 at 9:33 am

        Lourens –

        Alfresco has behaviors and rule functionality, which is similar to the Documentum Business Object Framework. This could be one potential way to solve your problem.

        Ellen

        Reply
  4. Ellen says

    January 5, 2012 at 12:10 pm

    To clarify the above post, it is our understanding that attribute/value encryption functionality will be updated in the upcoming Alfresco 4.0 release. Content encryption would still be a customization.

    Reply
    • Paras says

      January 5, 2012 at 6:04 pm

      How good is encryption Key-Management in Alfresco?

      e.g. in Documentum you have

      A passphrase -> that encrypts the AEK -> that encrypts the repository key (in DB) -> that encrypts the filestore key (in DB) -> that encrypts the content

      There is good separation here – e.g. Person 1 knows the passphrase, Person 2 has access to the server but not the DB & Person 3 has access to the DB not the AEK on the server

      However there are little or no provisions for recycling keys – especially the AEK (which is the root)

      regards
      – Paras

      Reply
      • Ray says

        January 6, 2012 at 10:08 am

        So Alfresco does not currenlty provide content encryption in the repository, only encryption for attribute values. This is a new feature relased in the 4.0 platform. Alfresco leverages java key stores. A full description on how it works is on the Alfresco wiki here.

        Reply
  5. McGovern says

    July 19, 2012 at 1:51 pm

    This list is based on evaluating Alfresco against Documentum capabilities. Are there any differentiating capabilities Alfresco provides which Documentum doesn’t?

    Reply
    • eryan says

      August 8, 2012 at 9:27 am

      The overall functionality seen and felt by end users (Search, Renditions, Workflow, Content Modeling, etc.) is very similar. There may be minor details that are different from the two such as automatic notifications when a workflow task is overdue. The differences are more prominent in the underlying architecture.

      • Alfresco is Open Source. vs. other vendors being Closed Source. Open Source allows you to have more access to source code for troubleshooting.
      • Alfresco has REST-based API’s and the ability to extend them, which may make it easier to integrate with other enterprise solutions
      • Alfesco has a smaller installation footprint
      • Different Price Points for each software

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Alfresco – Activiti Workflow Thoughts « TSG Blog says:
    January 5, 2012 at 12:40 pm

    […] Open Source CMS Solutions BlogAbout « Alfresco versus Documentum for Controlled Documentation […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Search

Related Posts

  • Documentum and Alfresco – Versioning, Security and Relationship Differences
  • Documentum or Alfresco – Controlled Documents Application – Post Approval Property Updates
  • Documentum to Alfresco Migration – TSG Compliance Solution for Regulated Industries
  • Predictions for EMC Documentum in 2013
  • Documentum Migration to Alfresco – Summary of Series Postings
  • Documentum, Document Control and Alfresco
  • Microsoft Teams integration and the Alfresco Enterprise Viewer for Document Review
  • Documentum or Alfresco Interface – Ready for an Upgrade?
  • Alfresco Enterprise Viewer – Offline Annotation for Efficient Review
  • Content Service Platform Scaling – How Good Key Design and NoSQL can avoid the need for Elastic/Solr or other indexes

Recent Posts

  • Alfresco Content Accelerator and Alfresco Enterprise Viewer – Improving User Collaboration Efficiency
  • Alfresco Content Accelerator – Document Notification Distribution Lists
  • Alfresco Webinar – Productivity Anywhere: How modern claim and policy document processing can help the new work-from-home normal succeed
  • Alfresco – Viewing Annotations on Versions
  • Alfresco Content Accelerator – Collaboration Enhancements
stacks-of-paper

11 BILLION DOCUMENT
BENCHMARK
OVERVIEW

Learn how TSG was able to leverage DynamoDB, S3, ElasticSearch & AWS to successfully migrate 11 Billion documents.

Download White Paper

Footer

Search

Contact

22 West Washington St
5th Floor
Chicago, IL 60602

inquiry@tsgrp.com

312.372.7777

Copyright © 2023 · Technology Services Group, Inc. · Log in

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Please accept this site's cookies, but you can opt-out if you wish. Privacy Policy ACCEPT | Cookie settings
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT