• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
TSB Alfresco Cobrand White tagline

Technology Services Group

  • Home
  • Products
    • Alfresco Enterprise Viewer
    • OpenContent Search
    • OpenContent Case
    • OpenContent Forms
    • OpenMigrate
    • OpenContent Web Services
    • OpenCapture
    • OpenOverlay
  • Solutions
    • Alfresco Content Accelerator for Claims Management
      • Claims Demo Series
    • Alfresco Content Accelerator for Policy & Procedure Management
      • Compliance Demo Series
    • OpenContent Accounts Payable
    • OpenContent Contract Management
    • OpenContent Batch Records
    • OpenContent Government
    • OpenContent Corporate Forms
    • OpenContent Construction Management
    • OpenContent Digital Archive
    • OpenContent Human Resources
    • OpenContent Patient Records
  • Platforms
    • Alfresco Consulting
      • Alfresco Case Study – Canadian Museum of Human Rights
      • Alfresco Case Study – New York Philharmonic
      • Alfresco Case Study – New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association
      • Alfresco Case Study – American Society for Clinical Pathology
      • Alfresco Case Study – American Association of Insurance Services
      • Alfresco Case Study – United Cerebral Palsy
    • HBase
    • DynamoDB
    • OpenText & Documentum Consulting
      • Upgrades – A Well Documented Approach
      • Life Science Solutions
        • Life Sciences Project Sampling
    • Veeva Consulting
    • Ephesoft
    • Workshare
  • Case Studies
    • White Papers
    • 11 Billion Document Migration
    • Learning Zone
    • Digital Asset Collection – Canadian Museum of Human Rights
    • Digital Archive and Retrieval – ASCP
    • Digital Archives – New York Philharmonic
    • Insurance Claim Processing – New York Property Insurance
    • Policy Forms Management with Machine Learning – AAIS
    • Liferay and Alfresco Portal – United Cerebral Palsy of Greater Chicago
  • About
    • Contact Us
  • Blog

Enterprise Search – Content Management Thoughts

You are here: Home / Documentum / Enterprise Search – Content Management Thoughts

March 17, 2011

Many clients are struggling with the concept of Enterprise Search.  While the last post  discussed ways to improve search results, this post will discuss thoughts and experience with a recent client focused on Enterprise Search.

Enterprise Search – What are the requirements?

Like many Enterprise Search efforts, our discussion started with a broad mantra of “I want to find anything, anytime from anywhere”.  Teams need to identify that this is more of a vision than a requirement.  For those of us in content management, imagine if we had a requirement that said we want “any document to be routed to anyone, anytime for approval?”  Experienced content management teams would work that “vision” scope to focus on certain documents, routed to certain people to reduce scope and make the initial effort a success with the goal of adding more documents and people in later efforts.  Enterprise search teams should look to reduce initial requirements as well.  Requirements we discussed included:

  • Published Content – Finding “anything” was scoped down to talk about “published” content.  For published, we identified that a user had to identify in some way that this document was ready to share with a broader group or the world.  This helped differentiate between collaboration content that might not be ready to be viewed by the world.
  • Secured Content – Similar to published content, finding “anything” was reduced to talk about access to both secure and unsecured content depending on the individual’s security profile.
  • Silo versus Cross Silo – We identified that, for certain “Siloed” groups, search would really be limited to their department or group and that allowing access to other groups information would really just result in extra clutter and could result in performance issues.  For other groups, the need to access across silos for an enterprise search would be required.
  • Document Types – The team wanted to focus on “published formats”, mostly PDF if possible but realized that other document types could be supported.  The team wanted to stay away from “author” formats (ex: Word), where the retriever might be able edit the document inappropriately.
  • Watermarks – Consistent with certain document types, the group wanted to add watermarks to retrieved documents where appropriate.

Enterprise Search Strategy

The team talked in high-level terms about how the strategy should embrace both the groups that wanted everyday access to departmental/group documents, while allowing cross-group access to certain users.  Overall, consistent with other clients, the concept of one monster repository or one search infrastructure didn’t meet many of the enterprise goals and would be difficult to implement.  Some important points:

  • Logical Authoring Repositories – Groups would have access to author/approve content.  For this client, this is Documentum but it could also be SharePoint or other content management tools.
  • Logical Published Repositories – logically (or physically) caching published/approved documents for consumers, both within the department/silo as well as for external cross-silo search.  The team thought this was a better approach than providing too much access to source repositories.
  • Scenario based user search requirements – The team spent time discussing how best to determine which groups needed cross-silo search and which groups would only want searching within their silo. 

Enterprise Search – It is not just a product

One thing we took away from the conversation was that, while software vendors like to label their products as “Enterprise Search”, an Enterprise Search strategy should not rely on just picking one product.  As a very obvious example, most of the Documentum users remember how ESS (Enterprise Search Service) turned into DSS (Documentum Search Service) and is now xPlore (limited to Documentum content.  Specific user requirements will drive out multiple search engines and repositories, each to fulfill specific search scenarios.   A “one-size-fits all” approach will struggle to address unique user scenarios specifically in regards to security and access.

Filed Under: Documentum, Lucene, SharePoint, xPlore

Reader Interactions

You must log in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Search

Related Posts

  • Documentum/Momentum EMC World Prep
  • Documentum Search – Why the Google appliance just doesn’t cut it
  • Documentum Performance – Search, Retrieval and Inbox
  • Documentum Top Tips for 2012
  • Documentum and SharePoint Search Alternatives – TSG WhitePaper Available
  • Documentum Migrations – Interview with OpenMigrate Product Manager
  • Documentum Alternatives and Disruptors – Alfresco or SharePoint?
  • Virtual Momentum Lisbon 2010 and Midwest Documentum User Group
  • Documentum Search Services – The Real Deal
  • EMC Documentum Search Services (DSS) Beta Recap

Recent Posts

  • Alfresco Content Accelerator and Alfresco Enterprise Viewer – Improving User Collaboration Efficiency
  • Alfresco Content Accelerator – Document Notification Distribution Lists
  • Alfresco Webinar – Productivity Anywhere: How modern claim and policy document processing can help the new work-from-home normal succeed
  • Alfresco – Viewing Annotations on Versions
  • Alfresco Content Accelerator – Collaboration Enhancements
stacks-of-paper

11 BILLION DOCUMENT
BENCHMARK
OVERVIEW

Learn how TSG was able to leverage DynamoDB, S3, ElasticSearch & AWS to successfully migrate 11 Billion documents.

Download White Paper

Footer

Search

Contact

22 West Washington St
5th Floor
Chicago, IL 60602

inquiry@tsgrp.com

312.372.7777

Copyright © 2023 · Technology Services Group, Inc. · Log in

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Please accept this site's cookies, but you can opt-out if you wish. Privacy Policy ACCEPT | Cookie settings
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT