• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
TSB Alfresco Cobrand White tagline

Technology Services Group

  • Home
  • Products
    • Alfresco Enterprise Viewer
    • OpenContent Search
    • OpenContent Case
    • OpenContent Forms
    • OpenMigrate
    • OpenContent Web Services
    • OpenCapture
    • OpenOverlay
  • Solutions
    • Alfresco Content Accelerator for Claims Management
      • Claims Demo Series
    • Alfresco Content Accelerator for Policy & Procedure Management
      • Compliance Demo Series
    • OpenContent Accounts Payable
    • OpenContent Contract Management
    • OpenContent Batch Records
    • OpenContent Government
    • OpenContent Corporate Forms
    • OpenContent Construction Management
    • OpenContent Digital Archive
    • OpenContent Human Resources
    • OpenContent Patient Records
  • Platforms
    • Alfresco Consulting
      • Alfresco Case Study – Canadian Museum of Human Rights
      • Alfresco Case Study – New York Philharmonic
      • Alfresco Case Study – New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association
      • Alfresco Case Study – American Society for Clinical Pathology
      • Alfresco Case Study – American Association of Insurance Services
      • Alfresco Case Study – United Cerebral Palsy
    • HBase
    • DynamoDB
    • OpenText & Documentum Consulting
      • Upgrades – A Well Documented Approach
      • Life Science Solutions
        • Life Sciences Project Sampling
    • Veeva Consulting
    • Ephesoft
    • Workshare
  • Case Studies
    • White Papers
    • 11 Billion Document Migration
    • Learning Zone
    • Digital Asset Collection – Canadian Museum of Human Rights
    • Digital Archive and Retrieval – ASCP
    • Digital Archives – New York Philharmonic
    • Insurance Claim Processing – New York Property Insurance
    • Policy Forms Management with Machine Learning – AAIS
    • Liferay and Alfresco Portal – United Cerebral Palsy of Greater Chicago
  • About
    • Contact Us
  • Blog

Documentum, Alfresco and SharePoint – Dispelling the Microsoft ECM Myths

You are here: Home / Alfresco / Documentum, Alfresco and SharePoint – Dispelling the Microsoft ECM Myths

February 15, 2010

Most of TSG’s Documentum and Alfresco clients are evaluating Sharepoint as a portal to ECM or to satisfy some of their ECM needs.  While TSG has always provided Sharepoint connectivity to ECM with OpenMigrate, ActiveWizard and OpenContent as demonstrated in the links below,

Active Wizard

OpenContent

OpenMigrate Sharepoint Source

many of our clients are asking “Hey, why not just use SharePoint instead?”  One recent client just finished an effort leveraging Sharepoint for ECM.  For this blog entry, I thought I would share some lessons learned as well as dispel some of the Microsoft Myths:

  • Myth #1 – Personal ECM – Much of SharePoint’s success is due to the easy nature of setting up a personal library or group space for collaboration.  As with Documentum’s eRoom product, this is typically a collaborative environment that empowers users to do something “fast” to share documents.  Is this really ECM?  Typical ECM customers have enterprise goals in regards to consistent taxonomy, security and indexing that a “quick and dirty” SharePoint library will not meet.
  • Myth #2 – Microsoft can Scale – For our client, SharePoint broke down and required additional indexing somewhere in the 5,000 to 10,000 document range both for performance and user navigation.  For most of our clients, 5 to 10 thousand documents is typically just a portion of their enterprise repositories.
  • Myth #3 – Market Share is important in the decision process – The logic would follow that large vendors are in a better position to offer a better product and long-term decision as compared to smaller, more niche driven vendors.  Microsoft, as a huge vendor with a dominant client base, would seem to be positioned as the best ECM solution.  Decision makers should keep in mind that much of the success of Microsoft SharePoint has been in the extension of Microsoft Office/Outlook and focused on collaboration, not necessarily in true ECM.  Does the number of installed seats of a product really mean anything if it is not being used for ECM and just for collaboration?
  • Myth #4 – Microsoft is Open – While it is easy to say that other document types can be stored in Microsoft (PDF for one), it should not be confused with the fact that Microsoft tends to lean toward their own products.  For example, many of our clients store Word Documents but have renditions available in PDF.  SharePoint doesn’t support this  “out of the box” as with Documentum.  In regards to futures, we would anticipate that Microsoft would continue to support their products first (Microsoft Mobile versus iPhone/Android) as the platform evolves.
  • Myth #5 – Microsoft back-end is “free” –Many times, initial use of SharePoint is because the client got it “free” with Windows Server.  It is important to understand that SharePoint is dependent and will always be dependent on a Microsoft back-end which will have a cost for true ECM implementations.  In particular, it is important to understand which items Microsoft will never support giving their “franchise” of Windows and Office and the cost implications including:
    • Linux Support (will always be Windows Server)
    • Database Support  (will always be SQL Server)
    • Development Support (will always be .Net and not Java or other technologies)
    • Complete support for non-Microsoft formats (PDF and XML as examples).  Will always have a preference to leverage Microsoft Office products and platforms.

If you have any comments/stories that either support the above or differ, please add a comment below.   Keep in mind that we are not saying SharePoint can’t be used for ECM, just hoping to share our thoughts on how ECM differs between collaboration tools like SharePoint and ECM tools like Documentum and Alfresco. 

Filed Under: Alfresco, D6, D6.5, Documentum, ECM Landscape, Product Suite, SharePoint

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Bob Barnes says

    February 17, 2010 at 2:14 pm

    I agree with everything written here! However, when Gartner’s magic Quadrant shows Microsoft leading most ECM’s it is difficult to convince management otherwise!

    Reply
    • TSG Dave says

      February 19, 2010 at 11:14 am

      Bob,

      Completely agree in trying to convince management that relies on the Gartner quadrant. Just to pass a link – you can read the whole quandrant article here:
      http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/oracle/article101/article101.html
      Myself, I am not sure if the quandrant is relevant anymore. I agree that Sharepoint has traction from a pricing, collaboration and existing infrastructure play and a play that we are addressing for our clients. Management must understand the concerns in regards to the “rest” of the microsoft infrastructure, microsoft formats and, to reference the Quandrant article, the difficulties of “inflated expectations of sponsors that can lead to deployment and governance concerns”.

      Reply
  2. Mike Sharp says

    August 26, 2010 at 1:57 pm

    I think the reason Gartner lists Microsoft ahead of EMC is that their definition of ECM is broader than this blog post would indicate. In particular, it includes document collaboration and WCM, areas where EMC is weaker, IMO.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Documentum – What’s Next Updated for 2010 « TSG Blog says:
    February 23, 2010 at 3:22 pm

    […] throughout blog.tsgrp.com for many posts including  SharePoint Myths, SharePoint – Adding ECM Structure and Active Wizard/SharePoint Integration.  Also, look for […]

    Reply
  2. Documentum and SharePoint – Key differences for document control applications « TSG Blog says:
    March 3, 2010 at 4:31 pm

    […] we pointed out in a previous post, Documentum users are used to storing a variety of document formats and doing retrievals, overlays, […]

    Reply
  3. TSG Blog – 18 months and counting « TSG Blog says:
    September 13, 2010 at 6:17 am

    […] SharePoint – Dispelling the Microsoft Myths – some angry feedback from the SharePoint community (that wasn’t posted) in regards to things we feel SharePoint doesn’t do as well as Documentum or Alfresco.   Note to future posters, be constructive and fair (and clean) and we are happy to post differing opinions.              […]

    Reply
  4. Whitney Tidmarsh leaves Documentum, General Manager of Box.net « TSG Blog says:
    April 14, 2011 at 2:51 pm

    […] and File Storage is only a small portion of Content Management.  As we have mentioned in previous posts about SharePoint, collaboration is easy, structured content management is […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Search

Related Posts

  • Documentum Client for Outlook, Notes Connector, iPhone and other thoughts on Content Management and Email
  • TSG Open Source Product Plans
  • Alfresco Consulting – Documentum Disruptor #2
  • Third Annual TSG Client Briefing – June 3rd – 2010
  • Documentum – What’s Next Updated for 2010
  • Documentum Consulting and Open Source
  • Documentum Migration – OpenMigrate for both large migrations and ongoing capture
  • ECM Roadmap – Thoughts on Planning for the Future
  • Top 5 Differences between Records Management and Document Management
  • GKC ARMA Panel Recap – Emerging ECM Trends

Recent Posts

  • Alfresco Content Accelerator and Alfresco Enterprise Viewer – Improving User Collaboration Efficiency
  • Alfresco Content Accelerator – Document Notification Distribution Lists
  • Alfresco Webinar – Productivity Anywhere: How modern claim and policy document processing can help the new work-from-home normal succeed
  • Alfresco – Viewing Annotations on Versions
  • Alfresco Content Accelerator – Collaboration Enhancements
stacks-of-paper

11 BILLION DOCUMENT
BENCHMARK
OVERVIEW

Learn how TSG was able to leverage DynamoDB, S3, ElasticSearch & AWS to successfully migrate 11 Billion documents.

Download White Paper

Footer

Search

Contact

22 West Washington St
5th Floor
Chicago, IL 60602

inquiry@tsgrp.com

312.372.7777

Copyright © 2023 · Technology Services Group, Inc. · Log in

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Please accept this site's cookies, but you can opt-out if you wish. Privacy Policy ACCEPT | Cookie settings
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT